saveas.now

PNG to WebP: smaller either way it matters

Lossless WebP beats PNG at its own game by about a third; lossy WebP crushes photographic PNGs entirely.

Runs in your browser. Your file never leaves your computer.

Drop files hereor click to choose, or paste

WebP gives PNG two separate upgrades. For graphics, logos and screenshots, lossless WebP stores identical pixels roughly a third smaller, transparency included, no catch. For photographs living in PNG files, lossy WebP at quality 82 cuts sizes drastically. The page inspects your image and defaults to the right mode, keeping exact pixels where exactness matters and trading invisibly where it does not. Both run locally, with the mode switchable under More options.

PNG1.2 MBWebP0.8 MBAbout 1.5× smaller
A 1.2 MB screenshot PNG becomes about 0.8 MB of lossless WebP, pixel-identical; photographic content in lossy mode drops much further.

Questions

Is lossless WebP really identical to the PNG?

Yes, pixel for pixel, transparency included. It is the same image in better compression, verifiable by comparison tools.

How does the page pick lossless versus lossy?

It samples the image: flat-colour graphics get lossless, photographic content gets quality 82 lossy. More options overrides either way.

Any reason to keep PNGs at all?

Pipelines that require PNG input, and maximum compatibility with old tools. For serving on the web, WebP wins.

All images conversions

Part of convert images in your browser. Every other conversion is on the conversions index.